General Exchange Insurance v. Driscoll
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtQua, J.
All three counts of the declaration are, in substance, for money had and received. The object of the action is to recover the sum of $300 which came into the hands of the defendant in the manner hereinafter set forth.
There is little or no genuine dispute about what we regard as the decisive facts. The plaintiff insured Francis D. Campion against damage to his automobile by collision. Campion’s automobile was in collision with an automobile owned by one Cohen and driven by one Sigel, and was damaged. The plaintiff paid Campion $450 under the terms of its policy and took from him so called…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp. v. Hooker Electrochemical Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Stevens v. Stewart-Warner Speedometer Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
- Bethlehem Fabricators, Inc. v. H. D. Watts Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- James v. City of NewtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
- Dearden v. HeyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Culver v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
- Ortiz v. Great Southern Fire & Casualty Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1980
- Vittands v. SudduthMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2000
- Hospital Service Corp. v. Pennsylvania InsuranceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1967
- Rock-Ola Manufacturing Corp. v. Music & Television Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.