Legal Opinion

Stein v. Kommit

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided July 31, 1929PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is the familiar case to enjoin the violation of a restrictive covenant in a bill of sale of the chattels and good will of a business consisting of cleaning, dyeing and tailoring work on personal clothing. The covenant reads:

"Party of the first part (defendant) further covenants and agrees not to participate in a similar business for a distance of ten blocks in all directions for a period of five years from the date hereof."

It is stipulated that the defendant has re-engaged in the same business at a location where there are less than five blocks intervening between his present place of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Katz v. NewmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1925
  2. Tsangas v. BroogosNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1924
  3. Weliky v. ZakrzewskiNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1924
  4. Mazie v. WilsonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1928

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Silbros, Inc. v. SolomonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1947
  2. Sandullo v. La BrunaNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1932
  3. The Davey Tree Expert Co. v. AhlersNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1938
  4. Bloomfield Baking Co. v. MaluviusNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API