Legal Opinion
Stein v. Kommit
New Jersey Court of Chancery
Decided July 31, 1929PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
This is the familiar case to enjoin the violation of a restrictive covenant in a bill of sale of the chattels and good will of a business consisting of cleaning, dyeing and tailoring work on personal clothing. The covenant reads:
"Party of the first part (defendant) further covenants and agrees not to participate in a similar business for a distance of ten blocks in all directions for a period of five years from the date hereof."
It is stipulated that the defendant has re-engaged in the same business at a location where there are less than five blocks intervening between his present place of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Katz v. NewmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1925
- Tsangas v. BroogosNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1924
- Weliky v. ZakrzewskiNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1924
- Mazie v. WilsonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1928
3Cited by4 opinions
- Silbros, Inc. v. SolomonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1947
- Sandullo v. La BrunaNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1932
- The Davey Tree Expert Co. v. AhlersNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1938
- Bloomfield Baking Co. v. MaluviusNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1932