Legal Opinion
Sandullo v. La Bruna
New Jersey Court of Chancery
Decided June 8, 1932PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The bill is filed to enforce an agreement by the seller of a business not to compete. La Bruna operated a barber shop at No. 115 Summit avenue, Union City, New Jersey. He sold to Costanzo the fixtures "together with the barber business and the good will thereof." At the foot of the bill of sale was written this contract:
"I, Luigi La Bruna, in consideration of the payment to me by James Costanzo of the sum of nine hundred seventy-five ($975) dollars, the purchase price mentioned in the within bill of sale, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, covenant, promise and agree that I will not,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Katz v. NewmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1925
- Tsangas v. BroogosNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1924
- Weliky v. ZakrzewskiNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1924
- Stein v. KommitNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1929
- Mazie v. WilsonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1928
3Cited by4 opinions
- Peterson v. Johnson Nut Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- Nisonoff v. CerebeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1948
- Bloomfield Baking Co. v. MaluviusNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1932
- Scuitier v. BarileNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950