Legal Opinion

Weliky v. Zakrzewski

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided April 10, 1924PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is a case for the construction of a restrictive clause as to resuming business within a certain area. The clause in the contract reads as follows: "The party of the first part is not to open a similar business or work for anybody in a similar business within the radius of ten city blocks for five years, east, west, north or south."

The principle involved in this case was decided in Messinger v. Fransblau, 118 Atl. Rep. 260. I, myself, filed an opinion in a case very similar to this in Tsangas v. Broogos, 95 N.J. Eq. 499. There is a slight variation in the wording of these restrictions,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Tsangas v. BroogosNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1924

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sandullo v. La BrunaNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1932
  2. Schwartz v. Van Der Plate Co., Inc.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1942
  3. Stein v. KommitNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1929
  4. Mazie v. WilsonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1928
  5. Scuitier v. BarileNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API