Weliky v. Zakrzewski
New Jersey Court of Chancery
1Opinion of the Court
This is a case for the construction of a restrictive clause as to resuming business within a certain area. The clause in the contract reads as follows: "The party of the first part is not to open a similar business or work for anybody in a similar business within the radius of ten city blocks for five years, east, west, north or south."
The principle involved in this case was decided in Messinger v. Fransblau, 118 Atl. Rep. 260. I, myself, filed an opinion in a case very similar to this in Tsangas v. Broogos, 95 N.J. Eq. 499. There is a slight variation in the wording of these restrictions,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Tsangas v. BroogosNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1924
3Cited by5 opinions
- Sandullo v. La BrunaNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1932
- Schwartz v. Van Der Plate Co., Inc.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1942
- Stein v. KommitNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1929
- Mazie v. WilsonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1928
- Scuitier v. BarileNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950