Legal Opinion
Silbros, Inc. v. Solomon
New Jersey Court of Chancery
Decided April 5, 1947No. Docket 147/658PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Neither modern public policy nor the judicial decisions of recent years have disapproved of contracts in restraint of trade between employer and employee where the restraint is reasonably necessary for the protection of the business of the employer and not unreasonably restrictive in point of time or territory upon the rights of the employee. Mandeville v. Harman, 42 N.J. Eq. 185; 7 Atl. Rep. 37; Crane v. Peer, 43 N.J. Eq. 553;4 Atl. Rep. 72; Sternberg v. O'Brien, 48 N.J. Eq. 370;22 Atl. Rep. 348; American Ice Co. v. Lynch, 74 N.J. Eq. 298;70 Atl. Rep. 138; Fleckenstein Bros. Co. v.…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Fivey v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1902
- Fleckenstein Bros. v. FleckensteinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1908
- Ideal Laundry Co. v. GugliemoneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1930
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. LodzinskiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1937
- A. Fink Sons v. GoldbergNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1927
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Solari Industries, Inc. v. MaladySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
- Silvestri v. South Orange Storage Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- Pilgrim Coat, Apron, C., Inc. v. KrzywulakNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1948
- Mullaly v. Carlisle Chemical Works, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1959
- Miller v. HendersonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.