Legal Opinion

Tsangas v. Broogos

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided January 16, 1924PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Church, V. C.

This is a case which involves the construction of a clause in an agreement which reads as follows: "The part]' of the first part agrees not to enter the same business within ten city blocks.” The complainant seeks to restrain the defendant from engaging in the restaurant business at 174 North Broad street, Newark, or any other place within ten city blocks of the complainant’s business.

It is admitted that defendant is in the restaurant business at that address. It seems to me that, in so far as this court is concerned, the question is res adjudiccda, under the case of Messinger v.…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Weliky v. ZakrzewskiNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1924
  2. Sandullo v. La BrunaNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1932
  3. Stein v. KommitNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1929
  4. Mazie v. WilsonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1928
  5. Scuitier v. BarileNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API