Legal Opinion

In re Disciplinary Action Against Upin

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 13, 2017No. A17-1541Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility has filed a petition for disciplinary action alleging that respondent Jeffrey D. Upin has committed professional misconduct warranting public discipline by failing to safeguard and misappropriating client funds. See Minn. R. Prof. Conduct 1.15(a), 8.4(c).

The parties have filed a stipulation for discipline. In it, respondent waives his procedural rights under Rule 14, Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility (RLPR); waives his right to answer; and unconditionally admits the allegations in the petition. The parties…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In Re Disciplinary Action Against AlbrechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  2. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against RooneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  3. In re Disciplinary Action Against FairbairnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
  4. In re Disciplinary Action Against TigueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
  5. In Re Disciplinary Action Against WentzelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API