Bruning v. Law Offices of Ronald J. Palagi, P.C.
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGerrard, J.
Thomas J. Bruning commenced this legal malpractice action, asserting that the defendants-appellees, Ronald J. Palagi, individually; Scot Bonnesen, individually; and the Law Offices of Ronald J. Palagi, P.C., were negligent in recommending a workers’ compensation settlement without conducting an adequate investigation to properly evaluate the claim and, in fact, recommending that Bruning accept an inadequate settlement. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants on grounds that Bruning’s acceptance of a workers’ compensation settlement and the execution of a release…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Grayson v. Wofsey, Rosen, Kweskin & KurianskySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- McWhirt v. HeaveyNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
- McVaney v. BAIRD, HOLM, McEACHENNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
- Kocsis v. HarrisonNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
- Zion Wheel Baptist Church v. HerzogNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Thomas v. BetheaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
- Boyle v. WelshNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
- Moulton v. BOARD OF ZONING APP., LINCOLNNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
- Young v. Govier & MiloneNebraska Supreme Court · 2013
- Fossett v. Board of Regents of University of NebraskaNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.