McVaney v. BAIRD, HOLM, McEACHEN
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFahrnbruch, J.
John J. McVaney appeals a directed verdict adverse to him in an attorney malpractice action in which he alleged inter alia that the defendant law firm failed to timely file a negligence action against the Metropolitan Utilities District (MUD).
In directing a verdict at the close of the plaintiff’s case in chief for the defendant law firm, Baird, Holm, McEachen, Pedersen, Hamann & Strasheim (Baird), the district court for Douglas County found as a matter of law that McVaney failed to adduce sufficient evidence from which a jury could find that negligence on the part of MUD was the proximate…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Kurtenbach v. TeKippeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977
- George v. CatonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979
- Driekosen v. Black, Sivalls & Bryson, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1954
- McCune v. NeitzelNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
- Canas v. Maryland Casualty Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1990
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Chem-Age Industries, Inc. v. GloverSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Keegan v. First Bank of Sioux FallsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Richardson v. GriffithsNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
- McWhirt v. HeaveyNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Touche Ross & Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1993
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.