Legal Opinion

Young v. Govier & Milone

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 12, 2013No. S-11-959PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nebraska Advance Sheets 224 286 NEBRASKA REPORTS records, I would agree that she had no reason to com- plain.27 But this case does not present those facts. Because law enforcement agents sought Wiedeman’s records solely to incriminate her in a targeted investigation, the search was not an administrative inspection and did not fall within the special needs exception. In short, targeted criminal investigations are distinct from other types of government searches. And once a court r ­ecognizes that citizens have legitimate expectations of pri- vacy in their prescription records, which many…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Stone v. City of StowOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  3. DeVaux v. DeVauxNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Smith v. Lincoln Meadows Homeowners Ass'nNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Landon v. PettijohnNebraska Supreme Court · 1989

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. SommersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  2. State v. ButtercaseNebraska Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Schaeffer v. FrakesNebraska Supreme Court · 2023
  4. Kozal v. SnyderNebraska Supreme Court · 2022
  5. Estate of Michael G. Cox II by Executors, Joleen Cox and Michael G. Cox Sr., and Joleen Cox, Individually and Michael G. Cox Sr., Individually. v. Dunakey & Klatt, P.C. N/K/A Klatt, Odekirk, Augustine, Sayer, Treinen & Rastede, P.C.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2017

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API