Grayson v. Wofsey, Rosen, Kweskin & Kuriansky
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtPalmer, J.
The principal issue raised by this appeal is whether a client who has agreed to the settlement of a marital dissolution action on the advice of his or her attorney may then recover against the attorney for the negligent handling of her case. The plaintiff, Elyn K. Grayson, brought this action against the defendants, Edward M. Kweskin, Emanuel Margolis, and their law firm, Wofsey, Rosen, Kweskin and Kuriansky, alleging that they had committed legal malpractice in the preparation and settlement of her dissolution action.1 *170After trial, a jury returned a verdict in the amount of $1,500,000…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Berry v. LoiseauSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Fishman v. BrooksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
- State v. HinckleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Muhammad v. Strassburger, McKenna, Messer, Shilobod & GutnickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Mather v. Griffin HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Potter v. Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- State v. CopasSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Black v. Goodwin, Loomis & Britton, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- McKay v. OwensIdaho Supreme Court · 1997
- Duni v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.