Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Bethea

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided October 9, 1998No. 7PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILNER, Judge.

In Prande v. Bell, 105 Md.App. 636, 656, 660 A.2d 1055, 1065 (1995), the Court of Special Appeals held that an attorney may be liable for professional malpractice for recommending that a client’s case be, or not be, settled on particular terms if “the attorney’s recommendation in regard to settlement was one that no reasonable attorney, having undertaken a reasonable investigation into the facts and law as would be appropriate under the circumstances, and -with knowledge of the same facts, would have made.” Applying Prande v. Bell, the appellate court in this case reversed a…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Impala Platinum Ltd. v. Impala Sales (U.S.A.), Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  2. Fishman v. BrooksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  3. Muhammad v. Strassburger, McKenna, Messer, Shilobod & GutnickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Flaherty v. WeinbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  5. Daugert v. PappasWashington Supreme Court · 1985

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Parler & Wobber v. Miles & Stockbridge, P.C.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  2. Environmental Network Corp. v. MillerOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Berringer v. SteeleCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  4. Kahn v. Morse & MowbrayNevada Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Garcia v. Kozlov, Seaton, Romanini & Brooks, P.C.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2004

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API