Legal Opinion

In Re Integration of the Bar

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided September 9, 1946PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Per curiam

The matter of the integration ©f the bar of Wisconsin pursuant to ch. 315, Laws of 1943, and the opinion of the court in Integration of Bar Case3 244 Wis. 8, 11 N. W. (2d), 604, 12 N. W. (2d), 699, on motion of Messrs. Quincy H. Hale and John S. Sprowls, next previous and current presidents, respectively, of the existing voluntary Wisconsin State Bar Association and others particularly mentioned in the statement preceding this opinion is before the court. The questions referred to in the statement preceding this opinion on which the court invited briefs and argument by members of the bar are…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Brydonjack v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  2. In Re Constitutionality of Chapter 315, Laws of 1943Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
  3. In Re Petition for Integration of Bar of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  4. In Re GibsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1931
  5. In Re ScottNevada Supreme Court · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Lathrop v. DonohueSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. State v. HolmesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
  3. In Re Hon. Charles E. KadingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  4. In re the Promulgation of the Rules of Civil Procedure for the StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  5. In Re the Complaint Against Judge GradyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API