In Re Scott
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] The petitioner believes that the record itself discloses that not only was the action of the board of governors and the local administrative committee and their proceedings illegal, but were also prejudicial; that they, by statements made to the petitioner, not only acted ill-advisedly, but they led the petitioner to believe that what they were doing was investigating his particular conduct, to determine if there were sufficient facts upon which they could base…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- In re the Proceedings for the Disbarment of BruenWashington Supreme Court · 1918
- State Bar of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- O'brien's PetitionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1906
- Cook v. Port of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1891
- State v. Port of AstoriaOregon Supreme Court · 1916
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- State Bar of Nevada v. ClaiborneNevada Supreme Court · 1988
- In Re Discipline of DrakulichNevada Supreme Court · 1995
- Colegio de Abogados de Puerto Rico v. SchneiderSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1982
- In Re GibsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1931
- State Ex Rel. Normile v. CooneyMontana Supreme Court · 1935
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.