Legal Opinion
In Re Hon. Charles E. Kading
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided November 25, 1975No. 75-154PublishedCited by 92 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilkie, C. J.
The matter before us concerns the validity of Rule 17 of the Judicial Code of Ethics which this court adopted on June 28, 1974, and which requires an annual financial report listing assets and liabilities of each state judge, owned by the judge, by his spouse, or by his legal dependents. Judge Kading filed his financial report (for assets and liabilities as of December 31, 1974) on March 5th, in advance of the March 15, 1975, deadline. All items were completed, with the exception of Item 10, which called for disclosure of assets. At Item 10 Judge Kading wrote the following words:
*514“Sorry. I…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by92 opinions
- State v. BangertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1986
- Kenneth A. Plante v. Larry Gonzalez, Etc., Jon C. Thomas v. Larry Gonzalez, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- State v. HolmesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. JenningsWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
- Falcon v. Alaska Public Offices CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.