Legal Opinion
Wilcox v. Hedwall
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 8, 1932No. 28,998PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.
Defendant appealed from an order denying his motion for a new trial in so far as the same was based upon assignments of error other than those having to do Avith the denial of defendant’s application for a trial by jury, gee Wilcox v. Hedwall, 185 Minn. 8, 239 N. W. 763, Avhere the historical facts are fully stated; and also Wilcox v. Hedwall, 186 Minn. 504, 243 N. W. 709.
As a general rule all questions involved and Avhich might have been raised on a former appeal are concluded by the decision on such appeal. McAlpine v. Fidelity & C. Co. 134 Minn. 192, 158 N. W. 967; School Dist. No. 1 v.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- McAlpine v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- School District No. 1, Itasca County v. AitonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- Wilcox v. HedwallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
- Wilcox v. HedwallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- Kozisek v. BrighamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
3Cited by2 opinions
- Welsand v. RAILROAD & WAREHOUSE COMMISSIONSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Bird v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937