Legal Opinion

Wilcox v. Hedwall

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 18, 1931No. 28,533PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

Plaintiffs, lessors, sue defendant, lessee, for arrears of rents and taxes under a 25-year ground lease. There was trial without a jury and decision for plaintiffs. Defendant’s motion for a neAv trial Avas granted upon the sole ground of error of law in a ruling that defendant had Avaived his right to trial by jury. From that order plaintiffs appeal.

The action being for the recovery of money under a contract, it is necessarily conceded that, unless waived, defendant Avas entitled to a jury trial under art. 1, § 4, of the state constitution. The issue whether defendant had waived a jury trial…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Eagle v. OldhamSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
  2. Shaw v. KentIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
  3. Maki v. St. Luke's Hospital Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  4. Stern v. ThayerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
  5. Hunt v. BoyceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Broida v. HayashiHawaii Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Wilcox v. HedwallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  3. Wanless Iron Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1934
  4. Kirby v. TipsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  5. Wilcox v. HedwallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API