Legal Opinion

Welsand v. RAILROAD & WAREHOUSE COMMISSION

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 7, 1958No. 37,306PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Matson, Justice.

Appeal from an order denying a new trial.

Appellants’ permit as contract carriers was canceled by the Railroad and Warehouse Commission. Upon appeal to the district court the commission’s order was affirmed. Appellants moved for a new trial which was denied.

Appellants are copartners doing business as the Welsand Transfer Company with their principal place of business in Litchfield, Minnesota. They have operated their trucking business under a contract-carrier permit since 1951. At that time they were authorized by the Railroad and Warehouse Commission (hereinafter called the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bowles v. WillinghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Bi-Metallic Investment Co. v. State Board of EqualizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. American Trucking Assns., Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  4. Breimhorst v. BeckmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  5. State ex rel. Beek v. WagenerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Wallace v. Commissioner of TaxationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  2. State Ex Rel. Spannaus v. HopfSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. In Re HubbardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  4. Blocher Outdoor Advertising Co. v. Minnesota Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  5. Contested Case of Christian Nursing Center v. Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API