Legal Opinion

Kozisek v. Brigham

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 29, 1931No. 28,454PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOlsbn, J.

Plaintiff brought this suit under G. S. 1923 (2 Mason, 1927) § 9172, to recover damages for an injury to his minor child, Anna Kozisek.

The cause of action alleged is for malpractice or negligence on the part of defendant, a physician and surgeon, in performing an operation on the leg of Anna Kozisek, in March, 1922. The action was commenced in the latter part of July, 1925. In the meantime, L. 1925, p. 102, c. 113 [2 Mason, 1927, § 9193] had been enacted, limiting the time to bring actions for malpractice to two years, after the cause of action accrued, the act to go into effect three months…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Messenger v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Kozisek v. BrighamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  3. Orr v. SuttonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  4. Terryll v. City of FaribaultSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
  5. School District No. 1, Itasca County v. AitonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kane v. LockeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  2. Wilcox v. HedwallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  3. Pearson v. NorellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API