Mullen v. Mullen
New Jersey Court of Chancery
1Opinion of the Court
This is a partition suit in which the lands involved have been sold under a decree for sale, which adjudged that the complainant, Mary H. Mullen, was seized of and entitled to one equal undivided half of the lands, subject to the interest therein of her husband, Thomas J. Mullen, by the curtesy initiate. She now petitions for an order directing payment to her of her share of the proceeds of sale, and that the right, if any, of her husband therein, be settled and determined.
The parties were married in 1895 and have had issue. They have not lived together since March, 1920, and since that date…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Reese v. StiresNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1917
- Bucci v. PopovichNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1921
- Hackensack Trust Co. v. TracyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1917
- Bucci v. PopovichSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1922
- Heldhauser v. SchulzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1922
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Mott v. IossaNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1935
- Walker v. BennettNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930
- Hollander v. AbramsNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1926
- McGoldrick v. GrebensteinNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1931
- Fire Guard Sprinkler Corp. v. ManolioNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.