Legal Opinion

Hackensack Trust Co. v. Tracy

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided January 16, 1917PublishedCited by 12 opinions

On bill,, &c. On petition fqr surplus moneys.

1Opinion of the Court

Walker, Chancellor.

This is a foreclosure suit. Mary Katherine Tracy and James Tracjr, her husband, were the only defendants. The bill alleges that both of them were indebted to the complainant, on July 25th, 1912, in the sum of $1,000, and made their mortgage upon certain lands, in the county of Bergen, on that date to secure the debt. The bill also alleges that they were further indebted to the complainant, on June 28th, 1913, in a like sum of $1,000, and made their mortgage upon the same lands on the last-mentioned date to secure that debt. Such proceedings were had in the cause that a…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Boyd v. GunnisonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Vineland Savings & Loan Assn. v. FelmeyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
  3. Weaver v. PattersonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1920
  4. Walker v. BennettNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930
  5. Brasko v. DuchekNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1940

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API