Legal Opinion

Bucci v. Popovich

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided July 30, 1921PublishedCited by 12 opinions

On bill, &c. On motion to strike out bill. Messrs. Burnett, Sorg, Murray .& Duncan, for the complainants.

1Opinion of the Court

Fielder, V. C.

The bill of complaint alleges that on April 2d, 1921, complainants entered into _ a written contract with defendants, wherein complainants agreed to sell, and defendants agreed to buy, certain premises in the city of Newark; that prior to the date fixed for closing title, defendants informed complainants that defendants would not accept a conveyance from complainants because one of complainants’ predecessors in title, to wit, Bertha Miller, wife of Morris Miller, acquired title to the premises in question by deed dated May 20th, 1902, and that on October 25th, 1902, said Morris…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Taylor v. BorgfeldNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1947
  2. Hollander v. AbramsNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1926
  3. Mullen v. MullenNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1925
  4. Corradini v. v. & M. HOLDING CORP.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  5. In Re Estate of RauchNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API