Legal Opinion

Hollander v. Abrams

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided February 4, 1926PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is a bill for specific performance of an agreement for the sale of land. The complainant is the vendee and the defendant the vendor. The sole defense to the bill is that the defendant, at the date of the contract, was a married woman, and that the contract was executed and acknowledged by her alone, without the joinder of her husband. The matter comes before me on motion to strike out the answer and enter decree. While the answer admits most of the facts set out in the bill of complaint, the solicitors of the respective parties have filed a stipulation containing an agreed state of facts…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Galbraith v. LunsfordTennessee Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Engholm v. EkremNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Bucci v. PopovichNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1921
  4. Keller v. LindowCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910
  5. Krah v. WassmerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1908

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Miller v. HeadleyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1932
  2. Rudin v. RudinNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1929
  3. In Re SimpsonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1945
  4. Girard Acceptance Corp. v. StoopNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1980
  5. Hanley v. RichardsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1935

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API