Legal Opinion
Reese v. Stires
New Jersey Court of Chancery
Decided March 27, 1917PublishedCited by 17 opinions
On application for decree for sale in partition.
1Opinion of the Court
Walker, Chancellor.
This is a partition suit. The special master to whom the matter was referred to ascertain and report the right, title and interest of the respective parties in the premises sought, to be partitioned, or sold in lieu thereof,' reported inler alia as follows:
“By virtue of the seventh section of the act of March 3d, 1915 (P. L. 1915 p. 65), the defendant, John II. Hughes, husband of Mary C. Hughes, has no estate or interest as tenant by the curtesy initiate in any part of said premises, and the defendant, Clara. Lesher, wife of Franklin L. Lesher, is not entitled to any…
2Cited by17 opinions
- Talcott v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1928
- Lucas v. HandcockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
- Gershon v. Regency Diving CenterNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2004
- In Re FlaschNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
- Kicey v. KiceyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.