Jaramillo v. Blackstone
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Respondents Leslie and Audrey Blackstone brought suit against appellants Abe Jaramillo and his employer Las Vegas Fertilizer Company (the Company), claiming that Leslie Blackstone was struck and injured by an automobile driven by Abe Jaramillo and owned by the Company. The jury returned a verdict indicating that Leslie Blackstone had been 63 percent negligent and that Jaramillo had been 37 percent negligent. The Black-stones timely moved for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict or, in the alternative, for a new trial. The district court granted the motion for a new trial, and it is…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Bates v. ChronisterNevada Supreme Court · 1984
- Driscoll v. ErreguibleNevada Supreme Court · 1971
- Weaver Bros., Ltd. v. MisskelleyNevada Supreme Court · 1982
- Eikelberger v. TolottiNevada Supreme Court · 1978
- Groomes v. FoxNevada Supreme Court · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by3 opinions
- M & R Inv. Co., Inc. v. MandarinoNevada Supreme Court · 1987
- Quintero v. McDonaldNevada Supreme Court · 2000
- Taylor v. VilcheckNevada Supreme Court · 1987