Legal Opinion

Quintero v. McDonald

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 2000No. 33287PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This appeal concerns an action for personal injuries brought by appellant Jacqueline Quintero against respondent Jerry McDonald and Dan McKennery. Although the jury found both McDonald and McKennery at fault, the jury awarded Quintero no damages. The district court denied Quintero’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or, in the alternative, for a new trial. The sole assignment of error on appeal arises from the failure of the jury to award damages.

FACTS

Quintero alleged below that she was injured when a motor vehicle operated by McKennery, in which she was a passenger, was…

3Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McNair v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State Employment Security Department v. Hilton Hotels Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Yamaha Motor Co., U.S.A. v. ArnoultNevada Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co. v. MercerNevada Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Prabhu v. LevineNevada Supreme Court · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by19 opinions

  1. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. v. ThitchenerNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Lee v. BallNevada Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Matkulak v. DavisNevada Supreme Court · 2022
  4. Caruso v. Maize (Child Custody)Nevada Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Clemons v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2023

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API