Legal Opinion

M & R Inv. Co., Inc. v. Mandarino

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1987No. 15652PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

At 9:00 p.m., on September 15, 1982, respondent and cross-appellant Daniel Mark Mandarino, an admitted “card counter,” 1 entered the Oasis Casino of the Dunes Hotel and began playing blackjack. Mandarino wore dark glasses and a false mustache, and he had slicked back his hair in an effort to conceal his true identity. Because Mandarino was employed by another casino, he was aware of the fact that casinos ban card counters from their property and distribute the photographs of known card counters to other gaming establishments.

A number of casino employees became suspicous of Man-darino…

3Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Carson Ready Mix, Inc. v. First National BankNevada Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Prins v. Holland-North America Mortgage Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Montesano v. Donrey Media GroupNevada Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Schouweiler Ex Rel. Baker Place Condominium Homeowners Ass'n v. Yancey Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Catrone v. 105 Casino CorporationNevada Supreme Court · 1966

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by21 opinions

  1. Pope v. MOTEL 6Nevada Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Kuhn v. Account Control Technology, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 1994
  3. K-Mart Corporation v. WashingtonNevada Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Schwartz v. Estate of GreenspunNevada Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Grosjean v. Imperial Palace, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2009

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API