Legal Opinion

Groomes v. Fox

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided May 22, 1980No. 11587PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

In this action to recover damages for injuries sustained in an automobile collision, the jury found for the defendants, Groomes and Whittlesea Blue Cab. The court granted a new trial since, in its view, there had occurred a manifest disregard by the jury of the instructions of the court. NRCP 59(a)(5).

The plaintiff below, Louis Fox, was a passenger for hire in the Whittlesea cab driven by Groomes. Before picking up Fox, Groomes noticed that his brakes were “mushy,” radioed that information to the dispatcher and was told to bring the cab in after his next fare. Mr. Fox and wife were the…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Price v. SinnottNevada Supreme Court · 1969

4Cited by5 opinions

  1. Taylor v. SilvaNevada Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Weaver Bros., Ltd. v. MisskelleyNevada Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Rees v. RoderiquesNevada Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Jaramillo v. BlackstoneNevada Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Town & Country Electric Co. v. HawkeNevada Supreme Court · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API