Legal Opinion

Bates v. Chronister

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1984No. 14759PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This is an appeal from the trial court’s ruling on cross motions for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict and from an order denying attorney’s fees. On the partial record before the court, we find that the Bateses established prima facie error in those rulings. Since the Chronisters failed to designate any pertinent portions of the trial transcript, we reverse all of the lower court’s orders and remand with instructions.

On April 3, 1980, Robert and Mary Bates agreed to sell to Troy Chronister three mobile home lots located on Pearl Avenue in Sun Valley, Nevada. The sales price on the…

3Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Neely v. Martin K. Eby Construction Co., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Brunzell v. Golden Gate National BankNevada Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Williams v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of ArlingtonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1981
  4. Century Fed. Sav. & Loan Assn. v. Van GlahnNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
  5. Driscoll v. ErreguibleNevada Supreme Court · 1971

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by32 opinions

  1. Wichinsky v. MosaNevada Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Ozawa v. Vision Airlines, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Schouweiler Ex Rel. Baker Place Condominium Homeowners Ass'n v. Yancey Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Brown v. Kinross Gold U.S.A., Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2008
  5. Polk v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2010

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API