Legal Opinion

Ryan v. Akeley

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 1880PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Ottawa. Replevin. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

This is a suit on a replevin bond. One-William R. Bowes sued out a writ of replevin from the circuit court for the county of Muskegon against Ryan to recover certain bark which Ryan had levied on by virture of attachment proceedings against Philip A. Wooley. The case went against Bowes by default, and *517Ryan’s right was ascertained as a lien under these attachment proceedings, and judgment went in his favor for $381.30 for damages and-costs. The proper steps having been taken to authorize suit on the replevin bond, a defense is set up denying Wooley’s title to the property levied on.

The court-…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lindner v. BrockMichigan Supreme Court · 1879

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pearl v. GarlockMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Henry v. QuackenbushMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Treadwell v. PaddockMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Jacobson v. MetzgarMichigan Supreme Court · 1880

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API