Quackenbush v. Henry

Defendant in error, Stephen Henry, recovered a judgment in replevin against plaintiff in error ,. Quackenbush, and waived a return. He then obtained *76a money judgment for the amount of certain executions which he claimed to have held against one Parmlee, and under which he set up that he had levied on the property in question. The suit, which is now removed by writ of error into this court, is on the replevin bond, and is defended on the ground that the sureties have a right, — which is not disputed by Henry’s counsel, — to show the invalidity of the execution claims as against other rights…