Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Reolds Farms Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 18, 1934No. Docket No. 78, Calendar No. 37,886PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPotter, J.

The facts in this case were sufficiently reported when it was here in 255 Mich. 240 and 261 Mich. 615. Plaintiff’s declaration consists of two counts, one upon written contracts annexed thereto and the other upon the common counts in assumpsit. When the case was here in 255 Mich. 240 it was reversed. The solé question presented was whether plaintiff was properly denied the right to give testimony to establish his cause of action under the common counts of the declaration. Mitchell v. Reolds Farms Co., 261 Mich. 615. When the case was last here it was reversed because defendant was denied the…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Keiswetter v. RubensteinMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Harrington v. Inter-State Business Men's Accident Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Kermott v. AyerMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
  4. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  5. People v. RobinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1943

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Gordon Sel-Way, Inc. v. Spence Bros.Michigan Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Solakis v. RobertsMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Banish v. City of HamtramckMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  4. Gordon Sel-Way, Inc. v. Spence Bros., Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Bowerman v. Detroit Free PressMichigan Supreme Court · 1939

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API