Vedder v. Spellman
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRosellini, J.
In this action, the plaintiffs, Herbert E. Vedder and Virginia T. Vedder, seek to recover compensation for work done in altering and repairing the home of the defendants, Harry F. Spellman and Alice G. Spellman. At *835the time this work was performed, the plaintiffs were not licensed to do contracting work, as required by RCW 18.27-.020, which provides:
It shall be unlawful for any person to submit any bid or do any work as a contractor until such person shall have been issued a certificate of registration by the state department of licenses. A partnership or joint venture shall be deemed…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. Northwest Magnesite Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1947
- Reed v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1901
- Grammer v. Skagit Valley Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1931
- Hederman v. GeorgeWashington Supreme Court · 1949
3Cited by29 opinions
- Kedzie and 103rd Currency Exchange, Inc. v. HodgeIllinois Supreme Court · 1993
- Tanner Electric Cooperative v. Puget Sound Power & LightWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- Davidson v. HensenWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Davidson v. HensenWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Bort v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.