Legal Opinion

Bort v. Parker

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 19, 2002No. 20029-9-IIIPublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Brown, A.C.J.

— David Parker, as “Owner,” entered into a home construction contract with “Louie Bort d/b/a LB Construction,” as “Contractor.” Louie Bort Company (LBC) is a State of Washington licensed and bonded contractor. The “Parties” section of the contract specified LBC’s state registration number as belonging to the Contractor. After concluding the Contractors Registration Act (CRA), RCW 18.27.080, precluded LBC’s complaint against Mr. Parker for breach of the construction contract, and, without considering LBC’s suggested equitable theories, the trial court dismissed LBC’s complaint at…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Berg v. HudesmanWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Ball v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. Hollis v. Garwall, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Ruff v. County of KingWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Tanner Electric Cooperative v. Puget Sound Power & LightWashington Supreme Court · 1996

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Go2Net, Inc. v. C I Host, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  2. Go2Net, Inc. v. CI Host, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  3. Dragt v. Dragt/DeTray, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  4. Pierce County v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  5. Dragt v. Dragt/DeTray, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API