Legal Opinion

Cambridge State Bank v. Dwyer

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 5, 1930No. 29,396PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Marshall, J.:

The action is brought by the plaintiff as indorsee to recover on a promissory note. Judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff on the pleadings and the opening statement of counsel for the defendant. The defendant appeals.

The note, dated June 16, 1928, contained the following provision:

“The makers and indorsers of this note hereby severally waive presentment for payment, notice of nonpayment, protest and notice of protest, and consent-that time of payment may be extended without notice thereof.”

The answer and the trial statement of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. South Bend Iron Works v. PaddockSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
  2. City National Bank v. Gunter Bros.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1903
  3. Rossville State Bank v. HesletSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  4. Schott v. LinscottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  5. Welsbach Street Lighting Co. v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hammond v. TateCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936
  2. Lorton v. HendersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1945
  3. Osborn v. MillikanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API