Legal Opinion

Osborn v. Millikan

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 8, 1934No. 31,858PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harvey, J.:

This is an action on a promissory note by the holder *593against the makers and the indorsers. The makers defaulted, and judgment was taken against them. The indorser defended on the ground that the note was a nonnegotiable instrument and that his indorsement had the effect only of transferring title. Judgment was for plaintiff, and the indorser has appealed.

The note sued upon, otherwise negotiable in form, contains the following provision, which appellant contends renders it nonnegotiable (we italicize the language specifically relied upon):

“It…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. City National Bank v. Gunter Bros.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1903
  2. Rossville State Bank v. HesletSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  3. Songer v. PetersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  4. Sykes v. Citizens' National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
  5. Nelson v. SouthworthSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. General Resources, Ltd.District Court, D. Colorado · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API