Legal Opinion
Hammond v. Tate
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided March 31, 1936No. 1360PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRATTON, Circuit Judge.
The Central National Bank of Ells-worth, Kan., suspended business on March *7025, 1931, and was placed in receivership. The receiver instituted this action against M. J. Tate to recover an alleged balance on a promissory note of $10,000, dated January 28, 1931, due sixty days after date, executed by M. J. Tate payable to the order of W. L. Tate and by the latter indorsed in blank and delivered to the bank, it being alleged that such note was thus indorsed and delivered as collateral security for a promissory note of $9,000 which W. L. Tate gave to the bank bearing the same…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- F. W. Woolworth Co. v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1930
- Larabee Flour Mills Co. v. CarignanoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
- King v. ThissellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
- Federal Trust Co. v. Bristol County Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
- Welsbach Street Lighting Co. v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- El Ranco, Inc. v. First National Bank of NevadaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
- Catherine Hitchcock, Administratrix of the Estate of Claud Hawkins, Deceased v. Cecil E. WeddleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
- Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. HowardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951
- Carolyn E. Jackson v. The City of Kansas City, KansasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971
- Woodmen of the World v. SugarCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.