Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided January 15, 1958No. 313-55PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMadden, Judge

The plaintiff brings this suit pursuant to a special Act of Congress which is quoted in finding 1. She alleges that her predecessor in title, the Colonial Realty Company, had a right, under an earlier Act of Congress, the Act of March 23, 1933,48 Stat. 1295, quoted in finding 2, to exchange, approximately acre for acre, 1,420 acres of land owned by it for more desirable lands owned by the Government, but that the Government wrongfully refused to accept some 230 acres of land tendered by Colonial, and to convey that acreage of the more desirable land to Colonial. The plaintiff seeks an…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. Thayer-West Point Hotel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. United States v. GoltraSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Energy Capital Corp. (As General Partner of Energy Capital Partners Limited Partnership) v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
  2. Franconia Associates v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
  3. Castle v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
  4. LaSalle Talman Bank, F.S.B. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
  5. Citizens Federal Bank, FSB v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API