Legal Opinion
United States v. Goltra
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided February 3, 1941No. Nos. 191, 192PublishedCited by 88 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Mu. Justice Reed
delivered the opinion of the Court.
The appeal brings here the correctness of the ruling by the Court of Claims which allows interest on a claim against the appellant, the United States. The cross appeal raises an issue that the compensation awarded is inadequate because the court failed to consider certain evidence as to the value for lease or use of the property involved. The judgment was entered upon a petition filed under authority of a private jurisdictional act, quoted in the margin.
This controversy had its inception on March 25, 1923. At that time Edward E. Goltra was…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Proprietors of the Charles River Bridge v. Proprietors of the Warren BridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1837
- Seaboard Air Line Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Danforth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Jacobs v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Boston Sand and Gravel Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by88 opinions
- Library of Congress v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Gerlach Live Stock Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Wickham Contracting Co., Inc., Ralph Perone v. Local Union No. 3, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Thayer-West Point Hotel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. Alcea Band of TillamooksSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.