Legal Opinion
LaSalle Talman Bank, F.S.B. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided September 30, 1999No. 92-652CPublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRUGGINK, Judge.
This case is similar to more than 120 other cases filed as a result of the impact of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 (“FIRREA”), Pub.L. No. 101-73, 103 Stat. 183, on the savings and loan industry. It is one of a handful of lead cases picked for early trial on the issue of damages flowing from what the Supreme Court has characterized in United States v. Winstar Corp., 518 U.S. 839, 870, 116 S.Ct. 2432, 135 L.Ed.2d 964 (1996), as the breach of contract implicit in FIRREA. Following that decision, this court granted summary judgment…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. Winstar Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. BehanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Winstar Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Energy Capital Corp. (As General Partner of Energy Capital Partners Limited Partnership) v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Lasalle Talman Bank, F.S.B. v. United States, Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Home Savings of America, Fsb v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Franconia Associates v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Coast Federal Bank, FSB v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.