Legal Opinion

Haight v. Marin Municipal Water District

California Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1930No. Docket No. S.F. 12430PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.

The judgment for plaintiff in the sum of $10,500 is hereby affirmed. Plaintiff Charles 0. Wellock, having died during pendency of the action and his administratrix having been substituted in his stead, the use of the word “plaintiff” herein will refer to said Charles O. Wellock, deceased. The defendant has appealed.

The action is one to recover damages for the alleged breach by defendant of a contract to sell and convey to plaintiff a tract of land of 459 acres lying near Fairfax, Marin County, California. On April 3, 1925, defendant, upon payment to it by plaintiff of the sum of $500,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hunt Bros. Co. v. San Lorenzo Etc. Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Johnson v. SchimpfCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Nelson v. Fernando Nelson & SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Glenbrook Development Co. v. City of BreaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  3. Coger v. WiltseyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  4. Yribarne v. County of San BernardinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. Ellwood v. NiedermeyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API