Legal Opinion
Coger v. Wiltsey
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 23, 1931No. Docket No. 4407PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TUTTLE, J., pro tem.
This action was brought to recover damages arising out of a breach of an agreement to sell real property. The trial was had before a jury, and a verdict was rendered against appellant in the sum of $9,000. The verdict also contained a finding in favor of defendant J. H. Wiltsey. This appeal is taken from the judgment entered upon the verdict, and is prosecuted by defendant and appellant, Mary J. Wiltsey. Counsel for appellant did not represent her at the trial.
On June 25, 1928, appellant was the owner of certain real property near Red Bluff, California, consisting of some…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Wilson v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Pellaton v. BrunskiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Merzoian v. KludjianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Haight v. Marin Municipal Water DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Kaufman v. BellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
3Cited by8 opinions
- Greenwich S.F., LLC v. WongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Christensen v. SlawterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Horning v. ShilbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Abbott v. FloydCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Gross v. Bank of America National Trust and Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.