Legal Opinion
Yribarne v. County of San Bernardino
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 17, 1963No. Civ. 7095PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CONLEY, J. *
The plaintiff, as a taxpayer and property owner within the boundaries of the proposed district, brought suit against the County of San Bernardino and the members of its board of supervisors to restrain them from calling an election or acting further in response to a petition for the organization of the “Big Bear Municipal Water District.’’ In his complaint the plaintiff alleges that the Municipal Water District Act of 1911, hereinafter referred to as the Act (Stats 1911, ch. 671, p. 1290, as amended; Deering’s “Water—Uncodified Acts, ’’ 1962 (Pt. One) Act 5243; West’s Wat. Code…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Hagar v. Reclamation District No. 108Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Fallbrook Irrigation District v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- In re the Bonds of the Madera Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Golden Gate Bridge & Highway District v. FeltCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Wilson v. Hidden Valley Municipal Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- City of Santa Cruz v. Local Agency Formation CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Fuller v. San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Bookout v. Local Agency Formation CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Bear Valley Mutual Water Co. v. County of San BernardinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.