Legal Opinion

Turell v. Anderson

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 11, 1936No. Civ. 10946PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROTH, J., pro tem.

In August, 1929, John W. Granros, deceased, engaged plaintiff to do all the work for the remainder of his life in a hotel operated by him in San Pedro. Deceased proposed that if the plaintiff would work for him as long as he lived he would pay her at the rate of $25 per week compensation therefor. Plaintiff accepted the offer and shortly thereafter, on September 1, 1929, com mcnced to work for him under said agreement, and did so work continuously until his death on- May 8, 1935. After the death of the decedent plaintiff continued to work in and care for and conduct said…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Etchas v. OrenaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Mayborne v. Citizens Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  3. Jeffords v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Hagan v. McNaryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Warder v. HutchisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Long v. RumseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Petersen v. MurphyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  3. Ayoob v. AyoobCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  4. Gaskins v. Security-First National, BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  5. Syler v. KatzerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API