Legal Opinion
Denise M. Wassenaar v. Office of Personnel Management
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided April 14, 1994No. 93-3043PublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHALL, Circuit Judge.
Denise M. Wassenaar petitions for review of the October 23, 1992 final decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board (Board) in Docket No. DC0831910664I1. In its decision, the Board sustained the reconsideration decision of the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) denying petitioner’s request for computation of her survivor annuity at a higher rate. Because OPM’s decision was based on an unreasonable interpretation of the statutes governing survivor annuities, we reverse and remand for recalculation of petitioner’s survivor annuity at the higher rate.
BACKGROUND
The facts…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Mallard v. United States Dist. Court for Southern Dist. of IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Haggar Co. v. Helvering, Com'r of Internal RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Ve Holding Corporation v. Johnson Gas Appliance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Eastman Kodak Company v. Bell & Howell Document Management Products CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Fornaro, Carmine v. James, Kay ColesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
- Juanita A. Rosete v. Office of Personnel ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- ICD Holdings S.A. v. FrankelDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Champagne v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996
- Bobo v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.