Legal Opinion
Champagne v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided March 15, 1996No. 94-983CPublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*202 OPINION
HORN, Judge.
This case is before the court on cross-motions for summary judgment, pursuant to Rule 56 of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (RCFC). Plaintiff, Arnold Champagne, filed a complaint in this court against the United States, acting through the Department of the Navy, challenging the disability rating assigned to him by the Navy after he sustained an injury during his tour of duty in May 1991. Plaintiff alleges that he is entitled to damages totalling “$1,000,000.00, representing the difference between the retirement pay due him under 10 U.S.C. § 1201, and…
2Cases cited86 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Borden, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998
- Telenor Satellite Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Haskins v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- Myers v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
- Marquardt Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.