Legal Opinion
Eastman Kodak Company v. Bell & Howell Document Management Products Company
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided June 2, 1993No. 92-1482PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MICHEL, Circuit Judge.
Eastman Kodak Company (Kodak) appeals from the decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (Board) of the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) in an intent-to-use application proceeding under the Lanham Act, as amended by the Trademark Law Revision Act of 1988,15 U.S.C. §§ 1051-1127 (1992), 1 Eastman Kodak Co. v. Bell & Howell Document Management Prods. Co., Nos. 86,083, 86,093, and 86,101 (TTAB June 8, 1992). In its decision, the Board denied Kodak’s motion for summary judgment, granting summary judgment for Bell & Howell Document Management Products Company (B & H)…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Pauley v. BethEnergy Mines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Department of the Treasury v. Federal Labor Relations AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- J.M. Huber Corp. v. Lowery Wellheads, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
- James E. Decosta, Vinson D. Thomas v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Arrow Fastener Co., Inc. v. The Stanley WorksCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Vita-Mix Corp. v. Basic Holding, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Kohler Co. v. Moen Incorporated, F/k/a Stanadyne, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Denise M. Wassenaar v. Office of Personnel ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Kelly Services, Inc. v. Creative Harbor, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.