Legal Opinion
People v. Sobel
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 31, 1974No. Docket Nos. 24534, 25504PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
JEFFERSON, Acting P. J.
Defendant Stewart Mortimer Sobel was charged by information in one count with violating Government Code section 1090 and section 1097, provisions prohibiting conflict of interest by public officials and employees. 1 It was charged that defendant, “being at all times, during the period alleged, a County employee, to wit, a deputy purchasing agent, on or about and between July 13, 1970 and April 18, 1972 at and in the County of Los Angeles, State of California, did wilfully, unlawfully and feloniously have a financial interest in contracts made by the said…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Stigall v. City of TaftCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Millbrae Assn. for Residential Survival v. City of MillbraeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- People v. DarbyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- People v. WatsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
3Cited by28 opinions
- People v. VallergaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- People v. GnassCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- People v. LofchieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- People v. Superior Court of Riverside Cnty.California Supreme Court · 2017
- D'AMATO v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.