Legal Opinion
People v. Gnass
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 10, 2002No. F036655PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BUCKLEY, J.
On December 9, 1999, the Stanislaus County Grand Jury returned an indictment charging William Ernest Gnass with 10 criminal violations of Government Code section 1090 1 in that he had a financial interest in each of 10 contracts he made in his official capacity as attorney for the City of Waterford (Waterford or the City). The contracts involved the issuance of bonds under the Marks-Roos Local Bond Pooling Act of 1985. (§ 6584 et seq.) Although neither the City nor the city attorney was a party to the contracts, the City received some of the bond proceeds, and Gnass was paid…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- United States v. Mississippi Valley Generating Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Johnson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Stigall v. City of TaftCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Thomson v. CallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Schaefer v. BerinsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Lexin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- HUB CITY SOLID WASTE SERVICES, INC. v. City of ComptonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Clay v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada ex rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 2013
- People v. Superior Court of Riverside Cnty.California Supreme Court · 2017
- California Housing Finance Agency v. Hanover/California Management & Accounting Center, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.