Legal Opinion

People v. Vallerga

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 8, 1977No. Crim. 27867PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FORD, P. J.

In a trial by jury, defendant Jack Vallerga was found guilty of the following offenses: (1) violation of section 1090 of the . Government Code 1 in that on or about April 9, 1973, defendant did “wilfully, unláwfully and feloniously have a financial interest in a contract which contract was made by him in his official capacity as Assessor of Orange County, California” (count I); (2) violation of section 424, subdivision 1, of the Penal Code 2 in that on or about March 12, 1973, defendant who, as Assessor of the County of Orange, was charged with the transfer and disbursement…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. People v. SedenoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. People v. HoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. People v. St. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  4. People v. MosherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  5. People v. LyonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. People v. DiedrichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Lexin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  3. People v. GreenbergerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  4. Quantification Settlement Agreement CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  5. People v. GrahamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API